home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / aus / comms / 445 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-21  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!math.fu-berlin.de!fauern!LRZnews!regent!monu1.cc.monash.edu.au!monu6!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!metro!sphinx!eram!dave
  2. From: dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall)
  3. Newsgroups: aus.comms
  4. Subject: Re: Can caller-ID be implemented on non-ISDN lines ?
  5. Message-ID: <1791@eram.esi.COM.AU>
  6. Date: 20 Nov 92 03:54:37 GMT
  7. References: <MALCOLM.92Nov19183648@nutmeg.cs.ntu.edu.au> <11115@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> <chris.722220370@suite.sw.oz.au>
  8. Distribution: aus
  9. Organization: Pacific ESI, Sydney, AUSTRALIA
  10. Lines: 14
  11.  
  12. In article <chris.722220370@suite.sw.oz.au>,
  13.     chris@suite.sw.oz.au (Chris Maltby) writes:
  14.  
  15. | I think the signalling is more likely to be DTMF. You probably already
  16. | have a DTMF processing chip in your phone/modem...
  17.  
  18. You have a sender.  DTMF receivers are more expensive.  Anyway, if it's
  19. anything at all like the USA system, it will be Bell 212 (FSK) between
  20. the first and second rings.  See comp.dcom.telecom for more details.
  21.  
  22. -- 
  23. Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
  24. dave@esi.COM.AU                ...munnari!esi.COM.AU!dave
  25.            Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"
  26.