home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!van-bc!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!access.usask.ca!mizar.cc.umanitoba.ca!ens
- From: ens@ccu.umanitoba.ca ()
- Subject: Re: quite unique
- Message-ID: <By6rM7.7MJ@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
- Sender: news@ccu.umanitoba.ca
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ccu.umanitoba.ca
- Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- References: <1992Nov17.163733.4389@Princeton.EDU> <28361@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1992Nov19.033247.27605@Princeton.EDU> <28508@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Distribution: alt
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 20:30:07 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In <28508@castle.ed.ac.uk> cam@castle.ed.ac.uk (Chris Malcolm) writes:
-
- [.... on program(me)]
- >That provided the opportunity. The choice was whether to follow Us
- >usage, to stick witht UK usage, or to exploit the possibility of a
- >distinction. Hundreds of writers spontaneously and independently took
- >the opportunity to make the distinction, in order to avoid the
- >ambiguities which had sometimes troubled them, and hundreds more
- >appreciated and approved of the change, and adopted it themselves.
-
- I don't believe this distinction adds anything useful to the language.
- Using a word with its usual meaning in a specific discipline is not
- reason enough to change its spelling, unless trademarks are involved.
- What sets 'computer program' apart from 'research program' or 'TV
- program' or 'concert program' (other than the modifier, obviously)?
-
- It sounds like you are just making an excuse for leaving off the -me
- because you are loathe to accept the fact that occasionally the
- British adopt a 'corrupt' American usage or spelling.
-
- Werner
-