home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.tek.com!tekig7!tekig5!briand
- From: briand@tekig5.pen.tek.com (Brian D Diehm)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Things go better with
- Message-ID: <7711@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 18:33:43 GMT
- References: <969.18.uupcb@pcs.sj.ca.us>
- Sender: news@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM
- Reply-To: briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM
- Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR.
- Lines: 27
-
- >DT>3. My understanding is that nylon was never a trademark, but was coined
- > >to be a generic.
- >
- >My understanding, too. du Pont's polyamide was a made-up term, but not
- >a copyright.
-
- I don't know about the trademark status, but the etymology of Nylon is very
- amusing.
-
- Usually such a name would come from the dweebs in marketing or PR. In this
- case, the chemical engineers came up with the name, and they presented it
- ready-made to management; management never thought of it other than by its
- "scientific" name. A fait accompli.
-
- However, that "scientific" name that the engineers presented management with
- was an invented name just like any other. In the case of Nylon, it was a
- collection of the first initials of the inventor's wives: Nancy, Yvette,
- Linda, and I forget the last two.
-
- Cute, eh? Good work, guys!
-
- -Brian
- --
- Brian Diehm
- Tektronix, Inc. (503) 627-3437 briand@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM
- P.O. Box 500, M/S 19-286
- Beaverton, OR 97077
-