home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!pagesat!netsys!agate!thor!dgreen
- From: dgreen@thor (David Greenebaum)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: why wOn't for wIll not?
- Message-ID: <1egtr4INNm4h@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 20:35:48 GMT
- References: <761.18.uupcb@pcs.sj.ca.us> <1efeprINN9h1@uranium.sto.pdb.sni.de>
- Organization: /etc/organization
- Lines: 21
- NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.berkeley.edu
-
- Stu Savory writes:
-
- >Would not, could not (see Walrus & Carpenter ;)
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >Would not, could not (see Walrus & Carpenter ;)
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >Would not, could not (see Walrus & Carpenter ;)
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- You do mean, "Lobster Quadrille", do'n't you?
-
- > [What I tell you three times, is true! ;-]
-
- The proof is complete, if only I've stated it thrice.
-
- ---------------------
- |\ | |\ |\ |// |
- | > | |\\ | \ |/ | David Greenebaum/University of California/Berkeley, CA
- |< | | \ | | | dgreen@athena.berkeley.edu, dgreen@garnet.berkeley.edu
- | > | | | | |
- |/ | | | | | "I make mistakes, but I am on the side of good -- by
- --------------------- accident and happenchance." -- the Golux
-