home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!wk223.nas.nasa.gov!asimov
- From: asimov@wk223.nas.nasa.gov (Daniel A. Asimov)
- Subject: Re: quite unique
- References: <1992Nov16.143026.23853@news.columbia.edu> <BxuK87.176@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <1992Nov17.181046.21137@nas.nasa.gov>
- Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator)
- Organization: NAS, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 19:23:04 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.192304.15503@nas.nasa.gov>
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Nov17.181046.21137@nas.nasa.gov> asimov@wk223.nas.nasa.gov (Daniel A. Asimov) writes:
- > [...]
- >In scientific contexts, on the other hand, there would be no sense
- >at all in trying, for example, to intensify "Two is the unique even
- >prime number" with a comparative.
- >
- >--Daz
-
- Come to think of it, consider the following two uniquenesses:
-
- a) 2 is the unique integer that is an even prime number.
-
- b) 1/3 is the unique real number x satisfying the equation 3x = 1.
-
- Since there are infinitely more real numbers than integers,
- perhaps it *does* make sense to say that 1/3 is "more unique"
- than the number 2, in the above contexts.
-
- --Daz
-