home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!agate!physics3!ted
- From: ted@physics3 (Emory F. Bunn)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: What's cooking?
- Followup-To: alt.usage.english
- Date: 18 Nov 1992 01:47:36 GMT
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
- Lines: 26
- Sender: ted@physics.berkeley.edu
- Message-ID: <1ec7boINNs78@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <BxvMIH.JvE@cs.psu.edu> <1ec3g6INNrep@agate.berkeley.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: physics3.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <1ec3g6INNrep@agate.berkeley.edu> dgreen@thor (David Greenebaum) writes:
- >Jin-Yuan Wu writes:
- >>
- >>I read a food ad and found two sentances which I don't understand.
- (stuff deleted.)
-
- >>(2) So come see what's cooking at Applebee's Festa Italiana.
- >
- >This is an idiomatic expression. "What's cooking?", like "What's
- >up?", is not meant to be taken literally. It means, "what's going
- >on, what's happening," or sometimes, "what is developing, what is
- >about to happen". The ad uses the expression in order to make a joke
- >on the word "cooking".
- >
- David is certainly correct in pointing out that the ad is playing on the
- two meanings of the phrase, "what's cooking." But putting that aside,
- I would like to point out that the sentence is perfectly correct even
- in its literal meaning, at least in my dialect.
-
- In my experience, the verb "to cook" has both an active and a passive sense.
- That is, both "I am cooking the eggplants" and "The eggplants are cooking"
- are correct. I believe Jin-Yuan's original question was something like
- "Is sentence (2) acceptable usage?" I would answer that it is.
-
- -Ted
-
-