home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu!meachem
- From: meachem@acsu.buffalo.edu (The Meach)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: quite unique
- Message-ID: <Bxv17o.B3y@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 12:26:12 GMT
- References: <1992Nov16.045912.17460@Princeton.EDU> <1992Nov16.060225.13337@news.columbia.edu> <1992Nov16.173817.20080@Princeton.EDU>
- Sender: nntp@acsu.buffalo.edu
- Followup-To: meachem@acsu.buffalo.edu
- Organization: UB
- Lines: 31
- Nntp-Posting-Host: vodalus.acsu.buffalo.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov16.173817.20080@Princeton.EDU> roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig) writes:
-
- [Apologies in advance for a follow-up to a topic that probably should have
- died of old age long ago. . . but this was too much!]
-
- >But anyway, we have seen that "unique" *does* and always has had more than
- >one meaning (at least since it took on the "one-of-a-kind" meaning, which
- >was not its original one), so the "many people believe" argument begs
- >all kinds of questions: which people? Why do they believe it? What of
- >all the other clearly accepted meanings? Keep "head" in mind, and stay
- >awake. And ask yourself why context, which works so well in keeping our
- >"head" on straight, would suddenly fail us with "unique."
-
- ". . .took on the 'one-of-a-kind' meaning, which was not its original one"?
- Roger, Roger. . . check your derivations!
-
- From the latin 'unicus', from unus: one --- more at ONE
-
- And, since last I knew, dictionary definitions have always been listed in
- order of propriety/frequency of [yes!] usage:
-
- all of the ones I have at hand list:
-
- 1. SINGLE, SOLE 2. being without a like or equal 3. UNPARALLELED, UNEQUALED
- and, finally: 4. very rare or uncommon : very unusual
-
- [Emphasis Webster]
-
- [Follow-ups set to Sender:]
-
- Jo Meachem [I shoulda stood in bed!]
-