home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!edcastle!cam
- From: cam@castle.ed.ac.uk (Chris Malcolm)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: A gender neutral pronoun
- Message-ID: <28242@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 03:12:23 GMT
- References: <721449297@tyranno.cs.duke.edu> <1992Nov11.200400.2865@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Nov13.135357.6450@den.mmc.com>
- Organization: Edinburgh University
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1992Nov13.135357.6450@den.mmc.com> lauter@pogo.den.mmc.com (Karen ) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov11.200400.2865@fcom.cc.utah.edu>, freier@mail.physics.utah.edu (rodney james freier) writes:
-
- >> I have noticed that I use the word "they" as a singular, gender unspecified
- >> pronoun. Example:
-
- >> I saw someone the other day. I was to far away to see what they looked like,
-
- >> I know that most people cringe hearing the strange mix of number in this sentence.
-
- >And rightfully so that people cringe. Since "they" refers to "someone" in the
- >first sentence, "he" or "she" should be used. The english language is
- >slaughtered so badly by so many, why should we contribute more when we know better.
-
- The use of "they" as a singular pronoun (with pl. verb form) in cases
- of common gender is as old, well established, and correct as the use
- of "you" in the singular, as any good dictionary will tell you, and as
- has been posted ad nauseam on this newsgroup.
-
- >I only hope that that we Americans aren't or don't become as ignorant as we sometimes
- >sound.
-
- It would help a lot if you consulted dictionaries more frequently.
- --
- Chris Malcolm cam@uk.ac.ed.aifh +44 (0)31 650 3085
- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University
- 5 Forrest Hill, Edinburgh, EH1 2QL, UK DoD #205
-