home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / alt / tv / lalaw / 710 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-19  |  1.2 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!ucbeh.san.uc.edu!cho
  2. From: cho@ucbeh.san.uc.edu
  3. Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
  4. Subject: Re: Who sent the flowers?
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov19.100521.2138@ucbeh.san.uc.edu>
  6. Date: 19 Nov 92 10:05:20 EST
  7. References: <1992Nov14.094730.1576@netcom.com> <Bxpw2p.9pr@cs.uiuc.edu> <tdawson.722046735@coolcat> <1992Nov18.131202.6673@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
  8. Distribution: world
  9. Organization: Univ. of Cincinnati
  10. Lines: 16
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Nov18.131202.6673@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>, jackie8@dasher.cc.bellcore.com () writes:
  13. > In article <tdawson.722046735@coolcat> tdawson@iphase.com (Tim Dawson) writes:
  14. >>
  15. >>I guess maybe I am alone on this - what about the possibility that Leland sent
  16. >>the flowers as a congratulations on winning her first case,although anonymously
  17. >>since he had to chew her out for "questionable" ethics?
  18. > 
  19. > You're not alone!  This was my first thought the second the flowers
  20. > came into view. Seems like something Leland would do.
  21. > 
  22. > Jackie
  23.  
  24. I think that Leland would have included an explanatory note like
  25. 'congratulations, keep up the great job you're doing'.... I think that the
  26. person who sent this anonymously is some flaming admirer, like that guy at
  27. Doug's trial.  -Pamela Cho-
  28.