home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.sys.amiga.demos
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!DIALix!shogun
- From: shogun@DIALix.oz.au (Matthew Fitzgerald)
- Subject: Re: Writing a StarField. Which method is best?
- Organization: DIALix Services, Perth, Western Australia
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 12:36:56 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.123656.28125@DIALix.oz.au>
- References: <1992Nov7.104910.60476@cc.usu.edu> <1992Nov11.131803.1276@ifi.uio.no> <1992Nov17.211753.11335@ntg.com> <1992Nov18.115111.8537@ifi.uio.no>
- Lines: 14
-
- Some coders (like myself) can't stand using includes, ok, system coding is
- a little different - everyone has their own methods! I know most of the
- hardware registers off the top of my head so why use symbolic names??? No-one
- sees y code except me and the other guys in my group, and I document my
- code ALOT - which is another reason why I don't use includes!!
-
- I still prefer to do EVERYTHING in hardware... (if I want to multi-task then
- I'll use system library functions etc!) It's fast and it makes your brain
- work harder figuring out your own algorithms, you must admit that when coding
- with libraries, alot of the work is already done for you!
-
- Matt (Onodi of Epsilon)
-
-
-