home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from garbage; Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:45:56 EST
- From: kyle@uunet.uu.net (Kyle Jones)
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:46:19 -0500
- Message-ID: <9211181646.AA14462@wendy-fate.UU.NET>
- Subject: Re: adjclock - automatically maintain real-time clock
- Newsgroups: alt.sources.d
- References: <1992Nov5.212138.4853@mlb.semi.harris.com>
- <21809@rpp386.lonestar.org>
- <SOUVA.92Nov18165737@aibn55.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
- Path: sparky!uunet!unreplyable!garbage
- Lines: 18
-
- Ignatios Souvatzis writes:
- > In article <1992Nov5.212138.4853@mlb.semi.harris.com>
- > chuck@melmac.Harris-ATD.com (Chuck Musciano) writes:
- >
- > In article <21809@rpp386.lonestar.org>, root@rpp386.lonestar.org
- > (System Administrator) writes: [ sources to adjtime deleted ]
- >
- > For those on the Internet, a better version of adjtime is
- >
- > rdate india.colorado.edu
- >
- > For those on the Internet, a much better version would be to use xntp,
- > preferably version 3, available from louie.udel.edu. and other sites
- > (use archie).
-
- Why bother running a server for this? For what applications is
- millisecond accuracy with reference to an atomic clock necessary?
- For most purposes I think this is overkill.
-