home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.society.civil-liberty:6582 alt.activism:18883 alt.politics.usa.constitution:1084 soc.history:9444 talk.politics.theory:4940
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!rsd
- From: rsd@sei.cmu.edu (Richard S D'Ippolito)
- Newsgroups: alt.society.civil-liberty,alt.activism,alt.politics.usa.constitution,soc.history,talk.politics.theory
- Subject: Re: [ACLU] Guardian of Liberty: American Civil Liberties Union
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.211433.19464@sei.cmu.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 21:14:33 GMT
- Article-I.D.: sei.1992Nov16.211433.19464
- References: <BxtFLA.6oD@cs.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: netnews@sei.cmu.edu (Netnews)
- Organization: The Software Engineering Institute
- Lines: 20
-
-
- In article <BxtFLA.6oD@cs.uiuc.edu>, kadie@cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie) writes:
-
-
- |> 1987: Block Bork
- |> The ACLU, changing a 51-year-old policy of
- |> neutrality on Supreme Court candidates, mounted
- |> a national campaign to defeat the nomination of
- |> Judge Robert Bork. Bork, the ACLU said, posed
- |> an extraordinary threat to fundamental liberties
- |> guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, and to the role
- |> of the Supreme Court as the guardian of those
- |> rights. A majority of Senators agreed and rejected
- |> his nomination.
-
-
- This alone is enough to keep me from ever entertaining membership -- Bork
- knows more Constitutional Law than the ACLU's 2000 attorneys put together.
-
- Rich
-