home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.shenanigans:593 alt.irc:4294 alt.culture.usenet:924
- Newsgroups: alt.shenanigans,alt.irc,alt.culture.usenet
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mercury.unt.edu!vaxb.acs.unt.edu!otto
- From: otto@vaxb.acs.unt.edu (M. Otto, "Virtual Prisoner of the VAX")
- Subject: Re: Usenet Prank
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.171930.1@vaxb.acs.unt.edu>
- Lines: 25
- Sender: usenet@mercury.unt.edu (UNT USENet Adminstrator)
- Organization: University of North Texas
- References: <1992Nov21.214901.24989@news.weeg.uiowa.edu>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 23:19:30 GMT
-
- In article <1992Nov21.214901.24989@news.weeg.uiowa.edu>,
- tlund@news.weeg.uiowa.edu (Thomas Lund) writes:
- > I admit, this one hits close to home. Imagine creating a post, the
- > text of which reads perfectly well into two or more _completely_ unrelated
- > newsgroups. It's best if the post is good and controversial. Then, when
- > people forward replies, they appear in both groups. The example I had in
- > mind was an animal-lovers group, a hunters group, and alt.non-sequiter thrown
- > in for a little more confusion.
-
- That sounds like a game a group of us used to play on IRC called "Crosspost."
- A 'bot would pick three or more newsgroups at random, then the participants
- would all attempt to come up with an appropriate subject line that could be
- legitimately crossposted to all the groups. The most creative answer would
- win that round. (Made for many arguments :)
-
- The problem was, of course, the judging. The only way to get an objective
- score would be to have all the participants actually come up with their own
- posts, and crosspost them. The one that generated the most followups would
- win.
-
- --
- __ ____ __ otto@vaxb.acs.unt.edu
- /|/| / / / / / / A virtual prisoner of the VAX // I'm sorry; my karma
- / |. /_/ / / /_/ at The University of North Texas \X/ ran over your dogma
- Denton, USA
-