home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.romance
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!batcomputer!reed!henson!news.u.washington.edu!thom
- From: thom@cac.washington.edu (Thom Roholt)
- Subject: Re: Is it me?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.194651.21144@u.washington.edu>
- Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: UW Networks and Distributed Computing
- References: <1992Nov13.211341.19205@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:46:51 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Nov13.211341.19205@cbfsb.cb.att.com> weird@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (john.t.erhardt) writes:
- >
- >To my last post I just wanted to add something. Christian teach that
- >sex should only be used between maried couples and for making babies only.
- >Well if sex was for making babies, it wouldn't feel so good!
- >
- >John Erhardt
-
-
- WHATEVER! Yes, Christians teach that sex should be saved for marriage. NO,
- sex is not only for making babies! It says in the bible (excuse the lack
- of a biblical reference) that after the man and the wife become married
- they shall become one (i.e. sex). Not in one place does the bible say
- that sex is for procreation only. Yes, some sects of the church preach
- this, but at least in my opinion (and many others for that matter) that is
- completely and utterly false. Don't bash out of ignorance. Think before
- you make broad generalizations!
-
- Thom
-
-