home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!inmet!bu.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jato!quake!throb!hardman
- From: hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman)
- Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
- Subject: Re: _PV_ According to Jon
- Message-ID: <RNaeuB5w165w@throb.mcws.fidonet.org>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 18:03:02 GMT
- References: <1e7q2dINN8hg@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>
- Reply-To: hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman)
- Organization: Bark At The Moon Productions
- Lines: 29
-
- ph36@unixg.ubc.ca (Richard Nistuk) writes:
-
- > In article <1992Nov15.041703.24772@lds-az.loral.com> jerry@lds-az.loral.com
- > (J Barbera) writes:
-
- > >As far as the equation debate: it was my impression when I first read it tha
- > >it dealt more with abstract concept *relevancies* than plugging in numbers.
- > >That is, the relation between the parts of the equation to each other and
- > >the other overall.
- >
- > That's silly for two reasons(that I can think of off hand):
- >
- > 1. IF the equation (PV=I*D^x) dealt with abstract concepts
- > then why bother creating an equation for them? And how could the equation
- > be experimentally tested? Would Ron just heave some letters together
- > and say "here ya go! This is the way it is!". Not even theorists(physics)
- > do that! What about all those years Ron spent testing his ideas?
-
- The answer to that question, Richard, would be did LRH say that you
- "can" determine the PV, or "may" determine the PV? What would the
- implications of interchanging those words have?
-
- Bill Hardman
-
- ------------------------------- :) -----------------------------------
- hardman = hardman@throb.uucp [modem (818) 352-6297]
- (Bark At The Moon Productions)
- *A Secret Cult*
- If you don't have anything nice to say....Say something Rude!!!!
-