home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.politics.clinton:17407 alt.politics.democrats.d:626 or.politics:680 talk.politics.misc:60732
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.tek.com!tekig7!tekig5!ssoar
- From: ssoar@tekig5.pen.tek.com (Steven E Soar)
- Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.democrats.d,or.politics,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: Re:income vs. consumption
- Message-ID: <7649@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 20:42:15 GMT
- References: <kbanaian.16.0@bernard.pitzer.claremont.edu> <kbanaian.22.0@bernard.pitzer.claremont.edu>
- Sender: news@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM
- Followup-To: alt.politics.clinton
- Distribution: usa
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <kbanaian.22.0@bernard.pitzer.claremont.edu>, kbanaian@bernard.pitzer.claremont.edu (King Banaian) writes:
- >
- > "Trickle down", dear readers, was first used by William Grieder in the
- > infamous interview with the traitorous Stockman in the Atlantic, August
- > 1981. ...
- >
- Is this "traitorous" Stockman the same one who after runnng the numbers,
- said that Reagan couldn't have both his tax cuts and his defense spending
- without running ruinous deficits? And was ignored? And was right?
-
- Just checking. :-)
- >
- >
- > Not so, my friend. From the days of Ricardo we know that taxes and deficits
- > get you approximately the same result in the market place. The thing that
- > drives it all is government spending.
- > >
- Please elaborate. I am interested in this thread and would like to see it
- discussed by someone trained in the subject. Speak more, please.
-
- steve soar
- (My cute quote got laid off...)
-
-
-