home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.personals:22538 alt.personals.ads:2970
- Newsgroups: alt.personals,alt.personals.ads
- Path: sparky!uunet!nwnexus!seanews!eskimo!wix
- From: wix@eskimo.com (Dennis Wicks)
- Subject: Re: REASON no Girls
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.025639.1967@eskimo.com>
- Organization: >>> Eskimo North (206)-FOR-EVER <<<
- References: <1992Nov9.222551.26910@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> <1992Nov11.194304.26993@udel.edu> <1992Nov16.183445.3115@phx.mcd.mot.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 02:56:39 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1992Nov16.183445.3115@phx.mcd.mot.com> sherm@phx.mcd.mot.com (cassie) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov11.194304.26993@udel.edu> yarringt@dewey.udel.edu (Debra Yarrington) writes:
- >>>>hhamid@nyx.cs.du.edu (hassan hamid) writes:
- >>>>
- >
- >>I just had to respond to this one. I find your implication that only ugly women go
- >>into computer science, while the good looking "girls" go into art subjects
- >>incredibly frustrating because of its ignorance. There are *all sorts* of women
- >>in computer science and engineering fields, and you can make no assumption about
- >>what any of us have in common other than that we're in computer science or an
- >>engineering field.
- >
- >There is one difference I have found between women in
- >Computer Science/Engineering and the ``art'' subjects.
- >
- >In GENERAL the women in Computer Science/Engineering
- >are smarter. Perhaps Hamid has a problem with smart women.
- >
-
- I hope you have your asbestos long johns on!! You are definitely
- going to get lots of flames for that statement!
-
- In GENERAL ...?? I don't think so. Different interests, maybe
- slightly different thought processes, different backgrounds.
- Maybe a whole lot of different things. But in GENERAL smarter?
- Whew!! That is _flame_bait_, pure and simple!
-
-
-