home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.homosexual
- Path: sparky!uunet!walter!qualcom.qualcomm.com!network.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!robj
- From: robj@netcom.com (Rob Jellinghaus)
- Subject: Re: Reasoning of Homos?????
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.174635.16304@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <1992Nov14.155626.14224@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> <92320.173143QAA@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Nov16.152428.24932@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:46:35 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Nov16.152428.24932@samba.oit.unc.edu> Gary.Saunders@launchpad.unc.edu (Gary Saunders) writes:
- >While I have zero interest in defending the idiot who began this thread, I
- >have to take exception to Tim Bieling's use of the phrase "stupid het
- >boys" to describe heterosexual males.
- ...
- >Surely you cannot
- >help the homosexual cause by using throwaway blanket condemnations of the
- >entire heterosexual community.
-
- Ease back there, Gary. "Stupid het boys" describes only one community:
- the community of stupid het boys, of which our idiot friend LoNgMaN is
- unquestionably a member. Are you stupid or a boy? If not, you're not
- a member of the community Tim was condemning. And surely you agree
- that stupid het boys are deserving of condemnation?
-
- No need to be quite so hair-trigger just because someone aims a flame
- in (sort of) your general direction. Whenever someone says "But _I'm_
- not like that," I wonder why they bother-if you're not like that, you
- don't need to _say_ you're not like that.
-
- --
- Rob Jellinghaus | "Next time you see a lie being spread or a bad
- robj@netcom.com | decision being made out of sheer ignorance,
- robj@xanadu.com | pause, and think of hypertext."
- uunet!netcom!robj | -- K. Eric Drexler, _Engines of Creation_
-