home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!malgudi.oar.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!wb9rxw!kf5iw!cmptrc!andy
- From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
- Newsgroups: alt.flame
- Subject: Bruce, Ken thinks you're lame [was Re: K e n Is Not Boring]
- Message-ID: <Bxw6ro.2rK@cmptrc.lonestar.org>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 03:23:47 GMT
- References: <Bxo1vF.ArK@cs.psu.edu> <1e8r85INN1oi@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> <1992Nov16.212937.11848@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX
- Lines: 24
-
- (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
- >
- >K e n was (and always is) correct. You are incorrect.
- >
- >Since K e n was correct, K e n does not require clues.
- >
- >--
- >Bruce A Bufalini <bbufalin@nyx.cs.du.edu>
-
-
- Really, Brucie, why *do* you take up for Ken? After all, Ken has posted
- here that he thinks YOU are:
-
- 1) misinformed
- 2) a cheap Ken imitator
- 3) in need of counseling
-
- I would post proof that Ken made these statements in the "Ken Slams Bufalini"
- thread, but then I'm not Darcy or Keegan, am I?
-
- Just curious why you admire him so, when he apparently holds you in such
- contempt.
-
- -- Andy
-