home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.feminism:4912 alt.folklore.urban:29443
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism,alt.folklore.urban
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!news.ils.nwu.edu!lynch
- From: lynch@ils.nwu.edu (Richard Lynch)
- Subject: Re: Death Threats and Pornography (was: Re: MacKinnon Suffers Snuff Harassment)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov24.001606.180@ils.nwu.edu>
- Sender: usenet@ils.nwu.edu (Mr. usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aristotle.ils.nwu.edu
- Organization: The Institute for the Learning Sciences
- References: <1992Nov21.222331.23196@netcom.com> <1992Nov22.210818.955@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov23.102117.8272@panix.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 00:16:06 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Nov23.102117.8272@panix.com> jk@panix.com (Jim Kalb) writes:
- >In <1992Nov22.210818.955@midway.uchicago.edu> mec6@quads.uchicago.edu (rini) writes:
- >
- >>I think he means you can't have sex repression without pornography
- >>and vice versa.
- >
- >What does it mean to say this? That if there is complete social
- >acceptance of all ways of expressing sexual impulses there won't be
- >any movies, pictures or books specifically intended to be sexually
- >arousing?
-
- Assume the writer meant pornography as 'sexually explicit material that some
- would repress', and you're all set.
- 'Course, that makes it a tautalogy, but so what?
-
- --
- "TANSTAAFL" Rich lynch@aristotle.ils.nwu.edu
-