home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.feminism:4869 alt.folklore.urban:29329
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism,alt.folklore.urban
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!panix!gcf
- From: gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch)
- Subject: Re: Death Threats and Pornography (was: Re: MacKinnon Suffers Snuff Harassment)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.044850.7382@panix.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 04:48:50 GMT
- References: <1992Nov21.063808.903@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov21.182026.14492@panix.com> <1992Nov21.222331.23196@netcom.com>
- Organization: mydog in exile
- Lines: 29
-
- gf:
- | > Given the passions aroused
- | >by the subject of sex-repression-and-pornography (can't have
- | >one without the other, so it's really one thing)
-
- payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne) writes:
- | I see three things, do you mean you can't have ---
- |
- | sex without repression
- | repression without pornography
- | sex without pornography
- |
- | or the reverse? (you can't have which-one without which-other?)
- |
- | Or did you forget a smiley? :^)
- |
- | I think it would be better to leave them as three distinct subjects.
-
- I thought I would be understood. For full, complete,
- and total explicitness, we need two levels of hyphenation,
- or use of parentheses:
-
- ((sex repression) and (pornography))
-
- Okay now?
- --
-
- )*( Gordon Fitch )*( gcf@panix.com )*(
- ( 1238 Blg. Grn. Sta., NY NY 10274 * 718.273.5556 )
-