home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!payner
- From: payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne)
- Subject: Re: Sex changes, was (Re: Self Appreciation)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.144650.2852@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <1992Nov17.191024.22626@netcom.com> <1992Nov17.210414.6486@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:46:50 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Nov17.210414.6486@midway.uchicago.edu> mec6@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
- >payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne) writes:
- >
- >>I have problems reconciling the concept of a "women in a man's body" (or vice
- >>versa) with the concept of sexual identity 100% assigned by social
- >>conditioning.
- >
- >As for myself, I have problems reconciling the concept of a "woman in a
- >man's body" (or vice versa) with the concept of sexual identity 100%
- >assigned by biology....
-
- Very good, and completely irrelevant, since this was never a claim of mine.
-
- Rini, is taking cheap shots all you feel up too?
-
- >rini
-
-
- Rich
-
- payner@netcom.com
-
-
-