home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.warlord:8448 alt.religion.kibology:4709
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!funic!news.cs.hut.fi!lk-hp-12.hut.fi!ovr
- From: ovr@lk-hp-12.hut.fi (Otto-Ville Ronkainen)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.warlord,alt.religion.kibology
- Subject: Re: Official "Guess That Ingredient" Sweepstakes!
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.161555.3732@cs.hut.fi>
- Date: 15 Nov 92 16:15:55 GMT
- References: <1992Nov12.165907.18079@tc.cornell.edu> <1992Nov13.043011.29204@spdcc.com> <RSHOLMES.92Nov14173123@rodan.syr.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@cs.hut.fi (Uutis Ankka)
- Reply-To: ovr@snakemail.hut.fi (Otto-Ville Ronkainen)
- Organization: L{nsi-Uudenmaan Keisarillinen Polyteknillinen Koulu
- Lines: 10
-
- In article <RSHOLMES.92Nov14173123@rodan.syr.EDU> rsholmes@rodan.syr.EDU (Rich Holmes) writes:
- >besides, horizontal candles don't burn as well. Wouldn't it be a lot
- >easier and more effective to cut or break the candle in half, making
- >two separate candles that could be burned vertically?
-
- How about warming the candle a bit at the middle and then bending it
- to a U-like shape?
- --
- Ott-Vill R______________________
- ovr@snakemail.hut.fi
-