home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!news.yale.edu!yar.trincoll.edu!usenet
- From: jay.wise@mail.trincoll.edu
- Subject: Re: Rush is RIGHT again
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.061040.3596@starbase.trincoll.edu>
- Sender: usenet@starbase.trincoll.edu (SACM Usenet News)
- Organization: Trinity College
- References: <1epe7iINNsuc@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 06:10:40 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <1epe7iINNsuc@agate.berkeley.edu> yeomans@luxor.ced.berkeley.edu
- (Gary Todd Yeomans) writes:
- >Rush was right about the UH-ReverUND JACKson-UH hiding in the wings for
- Clinton and the
- >big pay-off for hiding during the campaign. Did you people see that they had
- dinner and
- >Clinton went to one of Jackson's services where he called Clinton a "great
- healer"?
- >
- >Here it comes, Jackson's going to be named to the Supreme Court or Minister of
- the Interior
- >or something.
- >
- Hey, thanks for that well-reasoned and extremely logical argument, big guy!
- That's right, Jesse Jackson and Bill Clinton have been openly feuding for
- five years (ever since Jackson called the DLC Democrats for the Leisure
- Class), but, hey, it's obviously just a coverup that's been plotted for
- half a decade. And maybe Jimmy Carter will get Secretary of State!
-
- The fact is that Jesse Jackson and Bill Clinton have two wildly different
- agendas -- things they have always and will always disagree about. Just
- like Rush Limbaugh has a different set of priorities than George Bush --
- but wasn't that good ole incorruptible Rush himself out shilling for the ex
- President on the campaign trail?
-
- Anyway, please try to reason out your arguments. There are enough moronic
- things already spewed forth (most of them by Limbaugh himself, whose show
- is a tonic for the paranoid and repressed made up of the most wildly half-baked
- assumptions and laughably flimsy accusations), that I would hope you
- would try to cut down on the number you yourself send out.
-