NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27/NN_1992_27.iso/spool/alt/fan/rushlim/8903

Internet Message Format | 1992-11-20 | 3.7 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!network.ucsd.edu!sdcc12!sdcc3!pvanmeur
From: [e-mail] (Pim van Meurs)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch - Day 17
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 20 Nov 92 20:36:56 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California, San Diego
Lines: 67
Nntp-Posting-Host: sdcc3.ucsd.edu

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Don Wiggins) writes:
>[e-mail] (Pim van Meurs) writes:
>
> [multiple lines of insults deleted]

Insults to whom ? The truth might hurt but you could hardly call
them insults. Heck I am right almost 99 percent of the time.
>
>>Rush is a great entertainer who has found a great market to make a
>>few bucks.
>
> [multiple lines of insults deleted]

I repeat i am right almost 99 percent of the time. So don't insult
me by calling my truthful remarks about Rush an insult.
>
>Whew!  I knew if I slogged through this stuff long enough I'd find a
>valid point, and there it is.  Of _course_ Rush is an entertainer!
>What I don't understand is why people are so afraid of him.  They
>wouldn't think of viciously attacking Mark Russell or Arsenio Hall for
>raking Bush and Quayle over the coals, but they suddenly become very
>threatened when Rush Limbaugh does the same thing to Billary.  And by the
>way, you didn't really say that the left doesn't have an equivalent to
>Rush Limbaugh, did you?

Hmm I thought you said you had read what I wrote. Let me spell it
out in easier words.
Yes

Btw. I am nont afraid of Rush but I am afraid of the people  who
blindly seem to follow his ideas and lines of arguments. People who
blindly follow their leaders have more than once caused unnecessary
suffering to others who did not agree with them. People start
screaming fuckclintonkillclinton on alt.politics.bush. John Switzer,
someone I used to admire for his efforts to have daily updates of
Rush's show suddenly turns very bitter.
There is nothing more ugly than bad losers (except maybe for bad
winners :)).
Even Rush is starting to rave more than usual about the liberals
treating poor ol' george so badly. He didn't deserve to be called a
scheming bastard who was only interested in getting reelected at all
cost. Even if this required using the state department to
investigate Bill and Ross's passports. The truth about Iran contra
and Iraqgate will soon become public too. So I wonder why Rush
thinks the media gave George such a hard time. He got what he
deserved.
I am afraid of people who say that the best thing to do is "buy
gold, buy weapons and head for the hills.." just because liberals
have one an election. I am afraid of people who believe Rush when he
claims victory for conservatism after losing the presidency. He was
just joking guys, he wants you to feel better. Cheer up, laugh about
it, just don't believe it. He is an entertainer. That's all..
Pim van Meurs
Right almost 99 percent of the time (tm)
>
> ===========================================================================|
> |                                      | Success is getting what you want. |
> |Don Wiggins                           | Happiness is wanting what you get.|
> |Internet: [e-mail] |     -- Brother Dave Gardner       |
> ===========================================================================|


--
Pim van Meurs  UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Mail Code A-030       UUCP : ...!ucsd!ssurf.ucsd.edu!VANMEURS
UCSD La Jolla  CA 92093  ARPA : [e-mail]
(619)-458 9729 Home     Bitnet : VANMEURS%ssurf.ucsd.edu@sdsc