home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8625 alt.rush-limbaugh:9737 alt.politics.clinton:17187
- Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!studsys.mscs.mu.edu!marcr
- From: marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
- Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Date: 15 Nov 1992 18:22:08 GMT
- Organization: Marquette University - Department MSCS
- Lines: 21
- Message-ID: <1e64ggINNeg4@spool.mu.edu>
- References: <rdippold.721592462@qualcom> <92317.231441MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> <JASON.92Nov13081329@ab20.larc.nasa.gov>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: studsys.mscs.mu.edu
-
- In article <JASON.92Nov13081329@ab20.larc.nasa.gov> Jason C. Austin <j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov> writes:
- >In article <92317.231441MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> Mark 'Mark' Sachs <MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
- >-> Perhaps my memory fails me, but I don't recall too many significant
- >-> instances of "liberals" fighting free speech, beyond a few trivial
- >-> Perhaps you can point out a few opposing examples for us?
- > How about the protests and letters to get Rush taken off the
- >air whenever he moves into a new city?
-
- Wrong type of example, unless you want to include shouts of
- "<protester for cause X> go home." Where X is the anti/pro abortion/life
- crowd, or the no blood for oil protesters during the golf conflict.
-
- In which case, are you not expanding the rights under the constiution
- beyond what GOVERNMENT is impowered to do? (or not do)
-
-
- --
- Marc Rassbach marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu If you take my advice, that
- MS-DOS - it's not marc@milestn.mil.wi.us is your problem, not mine!
- my problem! If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
- Unix - It's a nice place to live, but you don't want to visit there.
-