NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27/NN_1992_27.iso/spool/alt/fan/montypy/9068

Text File | 1992-11-15 | 2.0 KB | 42 lines

Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!gacvx2.gac.edu!nntp-server!djohnson
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: job interview
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
From: [e-mail] (Daniel P Johnson)
Date: 15 Nov 92 22:48:28
References: <[e-mail]><[e-mail]>
Organization: Fill is a dope
Nntp-Posting-Host: cayenne.gac.edu
In-reply-to: [e-mail]'s message of 15 Nov 92 23:55:15 GMTLines: 29
Lines: 29

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Dan Blum) writes:

.How do you know?  Have you tried?

.It seems to me that the last poster should have checked before making
.her rash judgment.

Actually, I do believe that she was talking about lions and hats,
which have very little, or nothing to do with rashes.  Unless you are
allergic to them, but thats fairly unlikely.  I mean, who's heard of a
person being allergic to a hat?  Granted, you might be allergic to a
wool hat if you were allergic to wool, but in that case you're having
problems not with the hat, but with what it is made of, and thus the
that, but not because it *is* a hat.  You would be allergic to wool
sweaters in this case, not just hats, and you wouldn't be allergic to
either because they were hats and sweaters.  You'd be allergic to,
e.g., wool cotton-balls.  But those can't really be cotton balls
because they are made out of wool, and cotton balls are made out of
cotton.  But then again, you can't call them "Wool-balls".  I mean,
the guy in the drug store won't know what you're talking about.  And,
if you put a wool-ball in the medicine bottle (like they currently use
cotton-balls) of the pills that people take when they are allergic to
wool you'd have quite a problem.  Let cotton be cotton!  Thats what I
say.


.Captain Tool O'Satan (with Lieutenant's stripes)
.Decease
Dan aka Governor Thompson (Sub) Machine-Gun, decreased