home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6835 alt.politics.elections:23894 talk.politics.misc:60342
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!rutgers!news.cs.indiana.edu!babbage.ece.uc.edu!flash.ece.uc.edu!rbd
- From: rbd@flash.ece.uc.edu (Bobby Davis)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.elections,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: Re: RFD: alt.loathing.bob-dole
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.153143.22236@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 15:31:43 GMT
- References: <6953@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil> <1992Nov14.190351.9807@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <1992Nov16.053547.984@news.acns.nwu.edu>
- Sender: root@babbage.ece.uc.edu (Operator)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: University of Cincinnati, ECE Dept
- Lines: 22
- Nntp-Posting-Host: flash.ece.uc.edu
-
- Douglas Meier writes:
- >(Bobby Davis) writes:
- >>Yeah, I saw an interview with him on McNeil-Lehrer a couple of days after
- >>the election and all he kept saying was "57% of the country voted against
- >>Clinton, 57% of the country voted against Clinton, 57% of the country..."
- >>(you get the idea). Doley wanna cracker? - a parrot who knows seven words
- >>is pretty impressive! Somehow no one thought to mention to him that 62% of
- >>the country voted against Bush.
- >>
- >I find it particularly sad that you people (no offense intended) think
- --------------------------------
-
- Doesn't bother me, but then I am not in the NAACP either.
-
- >everyone was voting *against* one person in the pack. Could it be that people
- >voted FOR candidates because they thought one was going to do the best job?
-
- Although I voted for Paul Tsongas in our state primary, I voted for Clinton,
- not against Bush, on November 3. My point is that if Dole wants to use this
- "reasoning," someone should point out to him what it means regarding Bush.
-
- The other Robert Davis
-