home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / alt / drugs / 18736 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-22  |  1.0 KB  |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: alt.drugs
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cts.eiu.edu!cfthb
  3. From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
  4. Subject: Re: Poppers
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov22.142205.30865@ux1.cts.eiu.edu>
  6. Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 14:22:05 GMT
  7. References: <Qf3iCiu00WB68RxKUO@andrew.cmu.edu>
  8. Organization: Eastern Illinois University
  9. Lines: 16
  10.  
  11. In article <Qf3iCiu00WB68RxKUO@andrew.cmu.edu> Seth Malcolm Redmore <sr2s+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
  12. >
  13. >I was under the impression that poppers were nitrites, not
  14. >nitrates.
  15. >
  16. >Am I deluded?  Have I been lied to?  Am I just too tired of trying
  17. >to stick a Rhodium in my ligand that I am hallucinating and
  18. >dreaming all of this?
  19.  
  20.     I don't know.  If someone has told you that poppers are nitrates and
  21. not nitrites, yes.  Could be.
  22.  
  23. -- 
  24.    ******************************************************************
  25.      Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
  26.      Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ. 
  27.