home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.cyberpunk:6021 rec.arts.sf.written:15115
- Newsgroups: alt.cyberpunk,rec.arts.sf.written
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!tmaddox
- From: tmaddox@netcom.com (Tom Maddox)
- Subject: Re: Diamond-hard SF
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.010118.22532@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
- References: <8f3aZ9q00iV181Tes7@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 01:01:18 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- In article <8f3aZ9q00iV181Tes7@andrew.cmu.edu> Scott Gregory <wg2b+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
- >Excerpts from netnews.alt.cyberpunk: 20-Nov-92 Re: Diamond-hard SF by
- >Nick Szabo@techbook.com
- >> Gibson is perhaps the exemplar. He has a good understanding of how
- >> tech and society interact. He has skilled style, the ability
- >> to vividly describe a wide variety of new situations. Normal
- >> characters & plot? Not much and not dwelt on. Dilliard and
- >
- > Actually, one of the things Gibson has earned highest praise for is
- >his mastery of character development, a thing you claim to dislike.
-
- I don't think so. The work on Gibson I'm familiar with--and I've
- read a lot of it and written some--generally mentions the relative "flatness"
- of Gibson's characters (see E. M. Forster's _The Art of the Novel_ for the
- canonical distinction beteween "flat" and "round" characters). If you've
- got specific criticism in mind that commends Gibson's character development,
- I'd like to hear about it.
-
- In fact, I think Mr. Szabo has a point in talking about how Gibson
- is not interested in the kinds of psychological exploration typical of most
- non-genre fiction. J. G. Ballard talks about why this is so in several
- articles included in the Re/Search Ballard book. For that matter, I did as
- well, in an article in _Fantasy Review_ around the time of publication of
- _Count Zero_ (the article was reprinted in _The Year in Criticism, 1986_).
-
- Mr. Szabo's case for the kind of fiction he likes (?) or wishes was
- being written (?) or wants to hold up as a goal to aspire to (?) would be
- much better, I think, if he would drop the "diamond-hard" phrase, which is
- both silly and misleading, and the whimsical and uncertain "idea per page"
- criterion. (It is, of course, his nickel, and he can do as he wishes.)
- --
- Tom Maddox
- tmaddox@netcom.com
- "The Reptoids eat humans like we eat chickens."
- Alex Alexander
-