home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / alt / conspira / 12331 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-19  |  1.0 KB
  1. Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:12331 talk.politics.misc:60930 misc.legal:20181
  2. Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc,misc.legal
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!lanai.cs.ucla.edu!pierce
  4. From: pierce@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Brad Pierce)
  5. Subject: Re: LBJ's anti-nepotism law (was: Hillary will not...)
  6. Message-ID: <1992Nov19.192402.22116@cs.ucla.edu>
  7. Sender: usenet@cs.ucla.edu (Mr Usenet)
  8. Nntp-Posting-Host: lanai.cs.ucla.edu
  9. Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
  10. References: <1992Nov18.164718.10656@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov19.135113.26340@athena.mit.edu> <1992Nov19.173101.25548@midway.uchicago.edu>
  11. Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 19:24:02 GMT
  12. Lines: 9
  13.  
  14. In article <1992Nov19.173101.25548@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
  15. >It's de facto constitutional.  No president would dare challenge *this* law's 
  16. >constitutionality, even if it isn't constitutional.
  17.  
  18. Are there any states in the USA where that state's Supreme Court must
  19. review *all* state laws, determining whether they are constitutional?
  20.  
  21. -- Brad Pierce --
  22.  
  23.