home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!lord+
- Newsgroups: alt.consciousness
- Message-ID: <Uf4PLfK00WB_Jel1p1@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 23:56:11 -0500
- From: Tom Lord <lord+@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Subject: Re: I like Zen (was Re: I like consciousness)
- In-Reply-To: <Nov.23.11.58.02.1992.22974@ruhets.rutgers.edu>
- References: <1992Nov20.175526.1@hamp.hampshire.edu:<1992Nov22.180053.3672@cgrg.ohio-state.edu> <kf45PTu00WB80IYGcD@andrew.cmu.edu>
- <Nov.23.11.58.02.1992.22974@ruhets.rutgers.edu>
- Lines: 90
-
-
- I am my most effective when I am not thinking.
-
- I think you mean that you are your most effective when you are not in
- a frame of mind in which you you could describe your thoughts. Your
- brain is still working at those times -- its just not preoccupied with
- conceptual introspection. I would still call that state thinking --
- but i think i know what you mean.
-
- One thing that i find interesting about your use of `thinking' is that
- it appears to be very focused on the kinds of thoughts that can be
- communicated using conventional languages. Thinking, in your book, is
- a social activity. Aspects of your brain's activity that are private
- or truly individual you seem to deny the status of thought. Hmm.
-
-
-
- I disagree with this statement [that brains optimize]. Based on my
- observations of my self and many other people, they are pretty
- random in whether they improve or not.
-
- Maybe you mean that people don't always improve useful skills.
- Sometimes they get better and better at stupid things. Also, a lot of
- people find a niche, at which point their improvements become subtle.
-
-
-
- Sounds like you've been very fortunate in life. I observe most people
- fall into the equivalent of hypnosis and stay there most of their
- lives.
-
- Our brains can only fall into helpful states if you can let the data
- in. If you're too busy telling yourself things should be this way or
- things should be that way then you never have a chance to collect any
- real data.
-
- Have you noticed that the hypnotized people get better and better at
- being hypnotized and at building upon the social mechanisms that put
- them under? I think they `let in' lots of data, but not data that is
- especially useful if the goal is to nurture human lives. Their brains
- are indeed helpful, just not to their bodies.
-
-
-
- You have misunderstood what is meant by no-mind. As it is doomed to be
- misunderstood when one conceptualizes it. When a person is a master
- in a physical skill, there is no thought at all in the action. There
- is just a doing, and that's it. There is no trying in no-mind. "No
- try. Do, not do. No Try"-Yoda
-
- Oh what a crock. Doomed indeed.
-
- Skills involve plans, problems solving, complicated monitoring and
- feedback -- in short, thought. Yoda is just telling us that the plans
- and problem solving only need to be done so as to drive the motor
- skills actually involved in the work. That is, more often or not,
- there is no need to talk about our plans, think about them abstractly,
- recognize them for what they are, etc. I don't think it's literally
- `no thought' -- it's more like: ``The thought you are trying for is
- not the thought you can think about independently from acting on it.
- The thought that invokes the action is different from the thought that
- thinks it is trying to invoke the action.'' Yoda isn't trying to turn
- off all the neurons in luke's head -- he's just pointing out that
- luke's brain is so busy with one thought (``i'm trying'') that it is
- blocking out the needed thought (whatever thought it is that ends up
- triggering his telekinesis, if i remember correctly).
-
- My original post was in response to someone's description of
- meditation, and I tried to respond by giving a brief explanation of
- what my form of meditation is like. If you find my explanations vague,
- that cannot be helped, because it is purely experiential. It is not an
- experience that can possibly be captured by words. Therefor, I can
- only recommend the prerequisites for achieving such an experience.
-
- I am not trying to `capture' an experience in words. I am trying
- (clumsily i admit) to assemble words that are an accurate reflection
- of the experience. Note that, unlike n-thousand years ago, we have a
- lot of knowledge about how brains behave computationally and
- physically (and more coming in every day). This should allow us to
- construct meaningful models of increasingly many human experiences.
- The models are not the same thing as the experience, but they are
- maps for explorers.
-
-
-
- But before you talk meditation, find a teacher and DO meditation.
- Before you talk zen, spend some time DOING zen.
-
- yeah, right, whatever.
-
-