home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.child-support:3685 soc.men:19580 soc.women:19941 alt.dads-rights:2647
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu!xenon
- From: xenon@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.child-support,soc.men,soc.women,alt.dads-rights
- Subject: Re: Proposal for Child Support Legislation
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.131349.2608@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 13:13:47 -0500
- References: <1992Nov15.223913.23825@u.washington.edu> <1992Nov17.131102.2591@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu> <1992Nov18.134133.10893@ll.mit.edu>
- Organization: Carnegie Mellon Computer Club
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Nov18.134133.10893@ll.mit.edu>, yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich) writes:
- > In article <1992Nov17.131102.2591@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu> xenon@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu writes:
- >>In article <1992Nov15.223913.23825@u.washington.edu>, zzz@byron.u.washington.edu (Sample) writes:
- >>> I propose the following child support legislation.
- >>> 1. The courts should continue to award primary
- >>> custody to only one parent.
- >>> 2. The courts should divorce the parent who did
- >>> not receive the primary custody from his
- >>> children -- thereby terminating both his/her
- >>> rights (visitation) and duties (child support).
- >>
- >>What a load of moronic drivel! What benefit would accrue from such
- >>legislation, other than that YOU would get out of paying child support? For
- >
- >
- > Maybe to get *YOU* out of it as well!!
- >
-
- I don't want to "get out of it", I just want it to be fair. If I hadn't wanted
- children in my life I would have gotten a vasectomy. That's what Mr. EuSless
- should have done.
-
-
- - xenon
-
-