home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / alt / beer / 6948 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-17  |  1.2 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!walter!att-out!rutgers!ub!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!stein.u.washington.edu!machman
  2. From: machman@stein.u.washington.edu (The Machman)
  3. Newsgroups: alt.beer
  4. Subject: Re: Bud
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov16.215120.28227@u.washington.edu>
  6. Date: 16 Nov 92 21:51:20 GMT
  7. References: <hg2001-161192154538@m248-129.bgsu.edu>
  8. Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
  9. Organization: University of Washington
  10. Lines: 21
  11.  
  12. hg2001@mailserver.bgsu.edu (Heather) writes:
  13.  
  14. >Doesn't anyone like Bud anymore??  My personal fave is Bud Dry.
  15. >
  16. >Heather
  17.  
  18. Did anyone ever like Bud?  Or were we just being hypnotized by
  19. relentless "beer" ads.  Bud Dry is fine if you don't care whatever
  20. is getting you drunk tastes like.  It's remarkably inefficient as
  21. such an agent, though.  Try tequila instead.
  22.  
  23. If you enjoy beer for its taste, however, the idea of drinking
  24. Bud Dry is laughable.  
  25.  
  26.                         -- dave
  27.  
  28. -- 
  29.  /'''   The Machman        machman@u.washington.edu        david c carroll
  30.  c-OO                                                                      
  31.     \                     "Big Science.  Hallelujah"
  32.    -                                                                       
  33.