home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / talk / rape / 1904 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-07-31  |  934 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!dcrosgr
  2. From: dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu
  3. Newsgroups: talk.rape
  4. Subject: Re: Daniel: Spelling, targets, etc.
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul31.132401.9086@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
  6. Date: 31 Jul 92 18:24:01 GMT
  7. References: <1992Jul31.145827.29320@brtph560.bnr.ca>
  8. Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services
  9. Lines: 16
  10.  
  11. In article <1992Jul31.145827.29320@brtph560.bnr.ca>, kimmyd@bnr.ca (Kimmy Posey P920) writes:
  12.  
  13. > 
  14. > Yes blindly attacking a problem sometimes results in hitting the wrong target.
  15. > In the case of rape however, the target which I am attacking blindly or other-
  16. > wise is the rapist.  IMO this is the correct target.
  17.  
  18. Yes, but to date your only suggestion is public execution, even if innocent
  19. people die.
  20.  
  21. That is a bit like firing a mchine gun at a man holding a hostage tightly.
  22.  
  23. What other suggestions do you have?
  24.  
  25.  
  26. DC
  27.