home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.bizarre:23868 soc.culture.british:10917 alt.sex:25417
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!caen!nic.umass.edu!amherst!amhux1.amherst.edu!twpierce
- From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
- Newsgroups: talk.bizarre,soc.culture.british,alt.sex
- Subject: Re: SEX
- Message-ID: <1992Jul29.202802.12390@amhux2.amherst.edu>
- Date: 29 Jul 92 20:28:02 GMT
- References: <Bs225t.LI5@cs.dal.ca> <1992Jul27.181845.13105@udel.edu> <Bs2BC3.Mr@cs.dal.ca>
- Sender: usenet@amhux2.amherst.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Amherst College, Amherst MA
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: amhux1.amherst.edu
-
- In article <Bs2BC3.Mr@cs.dal.ca> franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve "edified" Franklin) writes:
- >In <1992Jul27.181845.13105@udel.edu> lim@pecan.cns.udel.edu (Julie Lim) writes:
- >
- >> Try thinking of it this way: replace the image of "homosexual man"
- >>with a woman you wouldn't want to have sex with. Maybe she smells funny.
- >>Maybe her personality just clashes with yours. In any case, you wouldn't
- >>boink her if you were paid.
- >
- > This is a poor analogly I'm afraid Julie. There is no correlation
- >between an unattractive female and a homosexual male.
-
- In terms of who you wouldn't want to sleep with, I think the analogy
- is perfect.
-
- >Although I would probably respect the homosexual more
- >if the female "smelled funny" or such, I still can't be expected to
- >cooperate sexually with any advances the homosexual might make for charity,
- >or for pleasure's sake...
-
- For money?
-
- --
- ____ Tim Pierce / "You mean there are TWO of you, Pierce?
- \ / twpierce@amherst.edu / God help us all."
- \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) / -- Major Charles Emerson Winchester III
-