home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.bizarre:23557 soc.culture.british:10736 alt.sex:25223
- Newsgroups: talk.bizarre,soc.culture.british,alt.sex
- Path: sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!udel!louie!pecan.cns.udel.edu!lim
- From: lim@pecan.cns.udel.edu (Julie Lim)
- Subject: Re: SEX
- Message-ID: <1992Jul27.181845.13105@udel.edu>
- Sender: usenet@udel.edu (USENET News Service)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pecan.cns.udel.edu
- Organization: University of Delaware, Newark
- References: <Bs14wy.Juw@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <goldenshower@vadier.gr.osf.org> <Bs225t.LI5@cs.dal.ca>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 18:18:45 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <Bs225t.LI5@cs.dal.ca> franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve "edified" Franklin) writes:
- >
- >This is ridiculous. I am afraid that I no longer can sit passively during
- >this thread. Homophobia is an IRRATIONAL response to homosexuals and
- >their practices. It is NOT irrational to be disgusted by the concept of two
- >(wo)men having sex. Although one should tolerate and leave alone such men and
- >women, they should never be forced to accept, practice, or condone it.
-
-
- Gosh, that sounds pretty irrational to me.
-
- Try thinking of it this way: replace the image of "homosexual man"
- with a woman you wouldn't want to have sex with. Maybe she smells funny.
- Maybe her personality just clashes with yours. In any case, you wouldn't
- boink her if you were paid.
-
- Now, even though *you* might not want to have sex with her, it's
- not inconceivable someone else might. You don't have to practice sex with
- the lass by any means, but that's no reason not to tolerate, leave alone,
- accept, or condone the concept of someone else doing the horizontal mamba
- with her.
-
- Does that edify you any more, mon cher Franklin? (just *try* saying
- "Franklin" with a nasal vowel at the end. It hurts.)
-
-
- --
- MUDname: Sidera "...If I seem to give a damn, please tell me. I would
- University of Delaware hate to be giving the wrong impression."
-