home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:29537 alt.abortion.inequity:2743 soc.men:13884
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity,soc.men
- Path: sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!mips!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!nocsun.NOC.Vitalink.COM!wetware!drieux
- From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
- Subject: Segmentation Fault Core Dump
- Message-ID: <1992Jul30.104009.6472@wetware.com>
- Sender: news@wetware.com (Usenet News Account)
- Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 10:40:09 GMT
- Lines: 42
-
- stevens@eatdust (John Stevens) writes:
- ]
- ] Pro-abortion means pro the choice to kill a baby. I would appreciate it
- ] if you people would just admit that. Saying that killing the fetus is
- ] not killing a baby is exactly the same as saying that murder shouldn't
- ] be illegal. If it isn't illegal to steal the probable future of a
- ] baby, why is it illegal to steal the probable future of a child, or
- ] adult?
-
-
- starting in reverse order:
-
- 1. Obviously John Here is new to the notion of Deficiet Spending,
- wherein the Current Government spends the Taxes of My UnBornGrandChildren.
-
- 2. John seems a little confused about the difference between
- the born and the Unborn. And while we are playing this record,
- again, How UnBornIsUnBorn?
-
- 3. Excuse please John, by BabyKiller[tm] is a reserved word,
- and these BleedingheartWimpLiberalNonVeterans are not card
- carrying members of the Club.
-
-
- Which brings me to trivia question time:
-
- How will OutLawing Abortion Change the Nature of the
- Inequity of Child support laws, and the presumption
- that Men are NOT parents, should not be awarded
- child custody, that women should NOT pay Alimony and
- child Support....
-
-
- ciao
- drieux
-
-
- --
- I Do Not Believe in .sig files
- as they are such a Known Waste Of BandWidth,
- And Therefore Not a Morally UpRight Choice.
- But I Can See the HideousHienousHandOfHeteroSexualityBehindItAll.
-