home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 29409 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-07-28  |  1.5 KB
  1. Xref: sparky talk.abortion:29409 alt.birthright:138 alt.abortion.inequity:2711
  2. Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.birthright,alt.abortion.inequity
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!boulder!ucsu!spot.Colorado.EDU!knapp
  4. From: knapp@spot.Colorado.EDU (David Knapp)
  5. Subject: Re: Shameless attack on pro-choicers in general!
  6. Message-ID: <1992Jul29.032349.15036@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
  7. Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
  8. Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.colorado.edu
  9. Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
  10. References: <1992Jul28.004856.13701@csus.edu> <adams.712339545@spssig>
  11. Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 03:23:49 GMT
  12. Lines: 19
  13.  
  14. In article <adams.712339545@spssig> adams@spss.com (Steve Adams) writes:
  15. >chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (Steve Chaney | Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0 ) writes:
  16.  
  17. [much rational response to irrational questions deleted]
  18.  
  19. >>11) Would rather have human fetal testing?  
  20. >This is a tougher question, to which I don't have an answer.
  21.  
  22. Steve Adams, I don't understand why fetal testing is different that corpse
  23. testing. If the fetus is dead, what is the problem? Do you find testing on
  24. dead adults reprehensable? There is much to be gained by studying and using
  25. the tissue of a dead fetus that would otherwise rot.
  26.  
  27.  
  28. -- 
  29. David Knapp                                      University of Colorado, Boulder
  30. Highly Opinionated, Aging  and                      knapp@spot.colorado.edu
  31. Perpetual Student of Chemistry and Physics.
  32.             Write me for an argument on your favorite subject.
  33.