home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!cmcl2!panix!eeb1
- From: eeb1@panix.com (Elizabeth Bartley)
- Subject: Re: Who's really doing the Unwanting?
- Message-ID: <1992Jul29.003453.479@panix.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:34:53 GMT
- References: <1992Jul12.171056.3591@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Jul21.174417.5924@noao.edu>
- Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1992Jul21.174417.5924@noao.edu>
- forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
-
- >ANYONE who suggests that abortion will "solve" any third world "problem".
- >If Planned Barrenhood bothered to ask any of the mothers in those countries,
- >before presuming to promote abortion as the solution to everything that
- >maybe these women don't consider problems, they would discover that those
- >mothers LOVE AND WANT their children!!
-
- Truth by Blatant Assertion if I ever saw it.
-
- >The problems are simply food distribution and waste management.
-
- Maybe. Maybe not. Your unsubstantiated claim is hardly convincing.
-
- > NOT "there are too many brownskinned babies".
-
- Suzanne, I know you believe the world isn't overpopulated because we
- could fit everyone in the world into Texas, but in discussions with
- those who *do* believe the world is overpopulated (a group which I'm
- not a member of, incidentally), you would do well to stipulate that
- those you're responding to honestly *do* believe in overpopulation
- instead of implicitly ruling that out as a possibility and accusing
- them of racism instead. What do you think when pro-choicer accuse
- (usually male) pro-lifers of wanting to control woman -- implicitly
- ruling out their stated desire to protect what they believe are
- children? Can you see the parallel?
-
- --
- Pro-Choice Anti-Roe Pro-Freedom of Choice Act - E. Elizabeth Bartley
-
-