home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcomsv!mork!gordons
- From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
- Subject: Re: How many deaths are insignificant? (was Re: THE THIRD TRIMESTER MYTH.
- Message-ID: <!hlm3hh.gordons@netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 07:08:28 GMT
- Organization: Stay Awake Software
- References: <1992Jul20.032555.29095@ncsu.edu> <1992Jul22.212034.28968@coopsol.com> <1992Jul25.062430.15507@rotag.mi.org>
- Lines: 26
-
- <1992Jul25.062430.15507@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- ><1992Jul22.212034.28968@coopsol.com> gordons@coopsol.com(Gordon Storga) writes:
- >>I have no objections with up to the moment of birth abortions.
- >
- >Do you have any objection to killing a viable z/e/f just prior to such an
- >abortion, where the killing is of no discernible medical benefit to the
- >pregnant woman?
-
- If it is the only way to make her "unpregnant" then I don't mind.
- However, termination of the pregnany is the point of an abortion. I see
- no reason why the fetus should be killed if it is not necessary to the
- immediate termination of the pregnancy. I also see no reason why the woman
- should be required to pay one more dime for this type of abortion than any
- other type.
-
- And your opinion?
-
-
- Gordon
- Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
- Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), and Diana (Sorceress),
- and married to the sweetest woman in the world, and proud of it.
- --
- The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
- of whatever company you think I work for. So there, thhhbbbt!
- Message to Kodak: Freedom for Dan Bredy.
-