home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!galen.med.Virginia.EDU!gjh
- From: gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis)
- Subject: Re: I'm a bit pissed...
- Message-ID: <1992Jul25.191422.5771@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
- References: <1992Jul24.011954.16225@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Jul24.185004.16938@uceng.UC.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 19:14:22 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <1992Jul24.185004.16938@uceng.UC.EDU> vlsi06@nest.ece.uc.edu
- (Gregory S Clausen) writes:
-
- } A "product of conception" by definition does not
- }have a heart, or any other human characteristic for that matter.
-
- Huh? Is this another disagreement in terminology? Have I just stummbled
- into an incredibly rich area in which to conduct my "semantic safari"?
- I think even Suzanne Forgash will disagree with this one.
-
- --
- hang gliding mailing list: hang-gliding-request@virginia.edu
- Galen Hekhuis UVa Health Sci Ctr (804)982-1646 gjh@virginia.edu
- chinaware from China, indiaware from India, and underwear from down under
-