home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!news
- From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
- Subject: Re: Fetal Heartbeat (Re: Supreme Court)
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul24.234126.4841@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 23:41:26 GMT
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lamail.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: The Village Waterbed
- Lines: 32
-
- In <BrwyvJ.BuM@news.cso.uiuc.edu> slkg9733@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steven L. Kellmeyer) writes:
- > Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com> writes:
- >
- > >In <BrwD8t.2vv@news.cso.uiuc.edu> slkg9733@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steven L. Kellme
- >
- > >> EVERY abortion (by the CDC counting definition) stops a beating heart.
- >
- > >"By the CDC counting definition" implies that they *define* abortion as
- > >surgical abortion, which is not true. What they're counting is abortions
- > >that are performed, as opposed to spontaneous abortions or fertilized
- > >eggs that failed to implant due to the use of abortifacients. As I stated
- > >above, I believe that the number of induced abortions is small in comparison.
- >
- > Get a life, Larry.
-
- I've already got one, thanks.
-
- > Induced abortion is the subject of this group, not spontaneous abortion.
-
- When did they rename it to "talk.abortion.induced"?
-
- > Your playing with words in an attempt to avoid looking stupid.
-
- Are you claiming that there are *not* people (both on this group and in
- the Real World) who want to ban abortifacients as well as induced
- abortions?
-
- > It's too late for that, so just give up.
-
- Considering the source, I can only smile at this.
-
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-