home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!pitt.edu!sgast
- From: sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Supreme Court
- Keywords: From: decay@
- Message-ID: <3707@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>
- Date: 24 Jul 92 22:25:51 GMT
- References: <1992Jul21.232927.9369@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Jul22.023334.257962@cs.cmu.edu> <1992Jul24.160408.11500@uceng.UC.EDU>
- Sender: news+@pitt.edu
- Organization: University of Pittsburgh
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <1992Jul24.160408.11500@uceng.UC.EDU> vlsi06@nest.ece.uc.edu (Gregory S Clausen) writes:
- #In article <1992Jul22.023334.257962@cs.cmu.edu> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
- ##
- ##Pity is right. I don't understand the relevance of the 1974
- ##market for OB/GYN's in Dallas, either.
-
- Rather than making any attempt to tell us what relevance
- he sees in the 1974 market for OB/GYN's in Dallas, Clause
- chose to reply to an old article written by a third
- person. Could someone explain why he did that?
-
- [included article deleted]
-
- Susan
-