home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!garvin
- From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
- Subject: Re: "Upon insertation, some pain may be experienced" (Was: CNN...)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul23.015352.235742@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 01:53:52 GMT
- Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
- Nntp-Posting-Host: satan.cimds.ri.cmu.edu
- References: <1992Jul22.011107.5048@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Jul23.005324.15532@noao.edu>
- Keywords: From: decay@
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Jul23.005324.15532@noao.edu> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
-
- [text about the origin of Rev. Schenck's pet fetus deleted]
-
- #Obviously he got it somewhere. Is it so off base to think he simply got it
- #from it's mother?
-
- Suzanne, all kidding aside, just how do you suppose that the
- woman would have gotten possession of the product of a
- prostaglandin abortion? If it is a stillbirth, then I
- could maybe understand some sick woman keeping the body,
- given that the birth occurred at home, but I cannot
- understand where you think the woman would have gotten
- it if it were an aborted fetus.
-
- Susan
-
-