home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 28260 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-21  |  995 b   |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!noao!forgach
  3. From: forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach)
  4. Subject: Re: CNN CENSORS PRO-LIFE AD
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul21.193132.9131@noao.edu>
  6. Originator: forgach@gemini.tuc.noao.edu
  7. Sender: news@noao.edu
  8. Nntp-Posting-Host: gemini.tuc.noao.edu
  9. Organization: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ, USA
  10. References: <1992Jul19.031320.199242@cs.cmu.edu>
  11. Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 19:31:32 GMT
  12. Lines: 13
  13.  
  14. From article by garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin):
  15. > In article fusco@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Andrew Fusco) writes:
  16. > 
  17. > #Prostoglandin abortions, which is a technique that is sometimes used
  18. > #today, will result in the abortion of a stillborn fetus. That is the
  19. > #fetus Rev. Shenck was carrying.
  20. > 
  21. > There is no way of proving your assertion.  A fetus aborted by
  22. > prostaglandin is indistinguishable from one spontaneously
  23. > aborted.  I doubt that we'll ever know what the truth is here.
  24.  
  25.  
  26. Unless the mother comes forth.
  27.