home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!purdue!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa2.lbl.gov!sichase
- From: sichase@csa2.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: ETs and Radio
- Message-ID: <24995@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
- Date: 28 Jul 92 21:39:26 GMT
- References: <a7327850@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au> <1992Jul28.105743.29096@news.Hawaii.Edu> <rwallace.712328556@unix1.tcd.ie>
- Reply-To: sichase@csa2.lbl.gov
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <rwallace.712328556@unix1.tcd.ie>, rwallace@unix1.tcd.ie (russell wallace) writes...
- >Given that for evolution of life to start, a simple living organism must
- >come together from amino acids etc. by accident; and that for any
- >complex structure to fall together by accident is extremely improbable;
- >then it looks pretty much like the odds against life appearing on any
- >one planet could easily be more than 10^1000 to 1 against, and the
- >number of planets in the visible universe is only about 10^22.
-
- It seems patently obvious to me that all of this back-of-the-envelope
- estimation is just a waste of time. None of us know any real probabilities
- for any of the events necessary for life - starting with how many planets
- there are down to the probability of chemical evolution. But one thing
- is for sure - it's such an exciting possibility that it's worth looking
- for someone out there just in case.
-
- -Scott
-
- --------------------
- Scott I. Chase "The question seems to be of such a character
- SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV that if I should come to life after my death
- and some mathematician were to tell me that it
- had been definitely settled, I think I would
- immediately drop dead again." - Vandiver
-