home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!tulane!rouge!srl02.cacs.usl.edu!pgf
- From: pgf@srl02.cacs.usl.edu (Phil G. Fraering)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: Magellan successors? (was Re: Support Lunar Resource Mapper Too!)
- Message-ID: <pgf.711826667@srl02.cacs.usl.edu>
- Date: 22 Jul 92 17:37:47 GMT
- References: <1992Jul18.140549.19705@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <19JUL199217191291@judy.uh.edu> <phfrom.204@nyx.uni-konstanz.de>,<1992Jul22.041320.1@fnala.fnal.gov> <1992Jul22.145544.20588@eng.umd.edu>
- Sender: anon@usl.edu (Anonymous NNTP Posting)
- Organization: Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana
- Lines: 18
-
- sysmgr@king.eng.umd.edu (Doug Mohney) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Jul22.041320.1@fnala.fnal.gov>, higgins@fnala.fnal.gov (Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey) writes:
-
- >>Flying a Magellan-type mission to Mars or the Moon would be neat, too,
- >>but synthetic-aperture radar demands a heavy committment of
- >>tracking-network resources.
-
- >Why?
-
- Because there is the possibility that subsurface features could be
- resolved?
-
- --
- Phil Fraering pgf@srl0x.cacs.usl.edu where the x is a number from 1-5.
- Phone: 318/365-5418
- "There are still 201969 unread articles in 1278 groups" - nn message
- "57 channels and nothing on" - Bruce Springsteen
-