home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
- Path: sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!mips!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!fusion
- From: ames!FNALD.FNAL.GOV!DROEGE
- Subject: Latest Result
- Message-ID: <920728132335.2040748d@FNALD.FNAL.GOV>
- Sender: scott@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Scott Hazen Mueller)
- Reply-To: ames!FNALD.FNAL.GOV!DROEGE
- Organization: Sci.physics.fusion/Mail Gateway
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 20:00:58 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- We continue the pseudo Ying experiment.
-
- We now have 4 days of running at an average of 8 hour source in/out time.
- This represents 5987 data points.
-
- Mean Power Source In/Mean Power Source Out = 1.001
-
- Looks like a null result to me. So back to 24 hour period. Yes Dick Blue
- I know to be careful of the earth's rotation. But note this is a 48 hour
- period. 24 hours in, 24 hours out. Perhaps Dick can name a few things off
- the top of his head with this period.
-
- The trouble with the skeptics is that they don't work very hard. Note that
- I did worry about 24 hours and ran 4 days so that there were the same number
- of samples at all times of day, with the 8 hour test. Come on Dick, you
- can do better than "Line Voltage". I am three layers of regulation (woops
- it is actually 4) away from that proble. And the last two are in a
- temperature controlled box. Why don't you think of something exotic for
- me to worry about, like the early morning utility frequency correction
- cycle? Tides are a little better. There is a small problem in my device
- that might even be tides. Why should I have a small day night effect when
- heavy water is in the calorimeter and not on the calibration runs? This
- is something to investigate when I give up on "anomalous heat". But Dick,
- I do look, and worry a lot! Of course there is a correction for air
- temperature. But it is really quite small, even when I run (as at present)
- with the outer shell servo off to allow wider calorimeter temperature
- control.
-
- Tom Droege
-