home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / sci / physics / fusion / 1840 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-26  |  1016 b   |  24 lines
  1. Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!samba!ajpierce
  3. From: ajpierce@med.unc.edu (Andrew Pierce)
  4. Subject: Re: Does it need to be hot?
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul27.051228.361@samba.oit.unc.edu>
  6. Sender: usenet@samba.oit.unc.edu
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: salvo.med.unc.edu
  8. Organization: UNC-CH School of Medicine
  9. References: <1992Jul27.011116.250111@cs.cmu.edu>
  10. Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 05:12:28 GMT
  11. Lines: 11
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Jul27.011116.250111@cs.cmu.edu> alexo+@cs.cmu.edu (Alex Orenshteyn) writes:
  14. >    Now that many are discussing different ways to get hot (read
  15. >alpha/gamma radio-active) substances closer to the electrode including
  16. >suggestions to create Pd/Po-210 alloys; I want to ask what makes everyone
  17.  
  18.    Does it matter which electrode it gets close to?  Why not use a soluble
  19. Po-210 salt in the solution along with the LiOD?  My guess is that there
  20. are appropriate choices for both anions and cations which undergo alpha
  21. (or whatever you want) decay in solution.
  22.      -Andy
  23. ajpierce@med.unc.edu
  24.